Fleet Finance News

Association of Fleet Professionals urges eVED delay to 2030

Share

The Association of Fleet Professionals (AFP) has called on the UK government to delay the introduction of electronic Vehicle Excise Duty (eVED) until 2030, warning that the current 2028 timeline could hinder electric vehicle adoption and place significant strain on fleet operators.

In its response to the government consultation, the AFP argues that aligning eVED with the planned 2030 ban on new internal combustion engine car sales would provide greater stability for fleets and the wider automotive market.

According to the organisation, the proposed system – based on predicted mileage -introduces a range of operational and administrative challenges. These include determining responsibility for mileage estimates, managing vehicles used by multiple drivers, separating business and private use, and addressing potential benefit-in-kind (BiK) tax implications.

Paul Hollick, chair of the AFP, said the proposals risk adding unnecessary complexity at a time when fleets are already navigating a difficult transition to electric vehicles.

“We strongly believe the government should look at ways of delaying and simplifying this proposal while reducing the burden on fleet operators,” he said. “Introducing eVED in 2028 is likely to slow adoption and increase costs. Moving implementation to 2030 better aligns with fleet cycles and avoids destabilising both the new and used markets.”

The AFP also highlighted concerns around how leasing companies would recover eVED costs, as well as the challenges of verifying mileage and conducting annual checks. It warned that the system could disproportionately impact rural drivers, who often travel longer distances and have fewer alternatives to private transport.

Instead of the proposed predictive model, the AFP has suggested alternative approaches, including retrospective taxation or applying tax to electricity used at charge points.

Dale Eynon, the AFP’s government affairs and policy lead, said feedback from members indicated a strong need for a simpler system.

“We consulted widely with members on this subject and there was a definite feeling the government’s proposals require rethinking at a fundamental level. Fleet operators want to see a simpler system less likely to impact on electric car adoption.”

The AFP’s response reflects growing industry concern that poorly timed or overly complex taxation measures could slow progress towards the UK’s net zero transport goals while increasing costs for businesses and drivers alike.